Movie Review: Prometheus

Posted Friday, June 8th, 2012 01:00 pm GMT -4 by 0

A great movie is built from a great story. Add great acting, visuals, special effects as needed, and good cinematography and editing and you’ve got a blockbuster. But skip the story, or skimp on the story or character development and you’ve got something that’s pretty, but ultimately not compelling.

And oh, how it pains me to say that the great Sir Ridley Scott could have done better with the sweeping sci-fi epic ‘Prometheus’, but that’s the sad truth, fellow fans. For a director who brought us the truly epic films ‘Alien’, ‘Blade Runner’, and ‘Gladiator’, among many others, it was a real drag to realize half-way through this film that visuals and effects had trumped story and that, while Prometheus is unquestionably visually stunning and astonishing, it just doesn’t really make a lot of sense.

The story itself is a clear nod to the original film ‘Alien’, within which world it takes place, albeit earlier in human history than the Nostromo expedition from the original film. Indeed, both have a crew of a dozen or more rough and tumble crew members, a few lead scientists, and a protagonist who is actually an android and — in homage to the delightfully malevolent HAL from “2001: A Space Odyssey” — might just be an antagonist after all. Who can tell?

The lead scientists on this intergalactic mission to try and learn where humans came from (hinted at in a confusing opening sequence that looked more like something out of the bizarre ‘Tree of Life’ or a National Geographic special) are Shaw (a terrific Noomi Rapace) and Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green), along with android David (superbly played by Michael Fassbender), detached corporation overseer Vickers (Charlize Theron), and ship’s captain Janek (Idris Elba). There are other characters, but many of them seem to be the same ‘red shirts’ that characterize all sci-fi horror films: alien fodder.

The film is set about 50 years in the future and starts to get truly interesting when we meet David, who is studying ‘Lawrence of Arabia’ and trying to emulate T.E. Lawrence (Peter O’Toole) from the film. He’s an android, but he’s bored. As they reach their destination, he’s tasked with waking up the various crew members from their deep stasis sleep. That sequence, and the tour of the ship we get prior, are amazing. Indeed, the first hour of the film had me riveted, sure that this was the next great epic sci-fi that we’d still be studying ten years from now.

Then as the story unfolded and the aliens appeared in all their slithery glory, things started to break down and it became increasingly difficult to understand why different members of the crew were behaving as they were. A great example: Fifield (Sean Harris) starts out as a rough, tattooed Irish thug of a crewmember, but ends up, well, you’ll see. It’s bizarre. Did no-one check for continuity in the characters?  It’s the same with David, who seems to have an entirely different mission than everyone else. Shades of HAL, but without any clear explanation of why, even as the film wraps up with a scene that might be a panacea for the fans, but really shouldn’t have been in the final edit.

I was expecting the world of ‘Prometheus’. The cast, the crew, the director, the universe within which the story unfolds, it all could have been so, so amazing. Instead, it’s a film that’s gorgeous on screen, truly epic, with splendid performances and a story that just falls apart.

Go see it on the big screen. Then come back here to ScienceFiction.com and let us know what you thought of the story and the reasons behind why different characters behave as they do throughout the film.

  • Baz

    This film is a MAJOR disappointment! Ridley Scott should be embarrassed!

    • robthom

       ^^

      The mind of a tween.

      • Baz

        Hardly a tween – I saw the original Alien, Blade Runner etc./ during their first runs in cinemas & know good film making when I see it. Mr Scott’s latest vision failed to live up to expectations. Ultimately the director must take responsibility for all aspects of the final film, to suggest Mr Scott should just shrug & blame his writers doesn’t hold water.

  • robthom

    ” But skip the story, or skimp on the story or character development and
    you’ve got something that’s pretty, but ultimately not compelling.”

    Why didn’t you mention who’s to blame for that terrible story?

    Was anybody, Ridley or the actors going to be able to make compelling characters from that script and dialogue?

  • The Doctor

    Yours is the most on-target review I have read so far and flagging the Fifield arc is spot-on. Makes no sense whatsoever and reminded me of one of those cutting room scenes that might have been fun to watch on a DVD extra, but that’s about it. I could go on with a long list, but I’ll just mention four: 1) If the medi-chamber doesn’t accommodate women, why is it in Vickers’ chamber? 2) No locks on Weyland’s secret hideaway??? 3) Robotic caesareans but no abortion pill? 4) Motive for poisoning Holloway?

  • http://twitter.com/5aturnfive Seyma-Er

    Although I loved the movie for both its scenario and the fascinating visuality, I appreciate this review for not complaning about the unanswered questions and the ambiguity of the movie which I thought made it a new and thought-provoking film as well as being a sequel to Alien. I also agree with the lack of 
    continuity in the characters though…. [sorry for my bad English]

  • Alex

    Prometheus:

     Year: 2012

     Director: Ridley
    Scott

     Cast: Noomi Rapace,
    Logan Marshall-Green ,Michael Fassbender, Guy Pearce, Idris Elba, and Charlize
    Theron.

     

    Rated: R

     

    Ridley Scott’s return to the realm
    of science fiction film after 30 years of absence (his last being Blade Runner)
    gives us his highly ambitious and anticipated film called Prometheus. It’s kind
    of “prequel” to original Alien(1979), but filled with own original
    mythology and ideas. Prometheus is a visual marvel with top notch stunning
    effects and amazing set desing. The story even though it gets somewhat
    predictable, especially in the second part of the film is filled with
    philosophical ideas and there is that never ending battle between science and
    religion that’s always present. There are some plot holes which where probably
    deliberately made and maybe pointing out for future movie installments. The
    action scenes are tense and gripping, and overall brilliantly done. The whole
    cast gives a great and intense performances, especially the Fassbender’s
    potrayal of the android David which i think is Oscar worthy and Noomi Rapace as
    leading archaeologist Elizabeth Shaw which remind us of continuing the
    tradition of strong female characters like the Sigourney Weaver’s one in Alien
    and it’s sequels. All aroud Prometheus certainly doesn’t disappoint especially
    if your a sci-fi fan. Of course the story could be more in depth through out,
    but it’s the questions that story raises even though it doesn’t provide us with
    any answers, which i believe makes the all experience that much more
    intriguing. It’s the kind of movie that you will either love or hate. I sure
    had a blast watching it.

     

    My score: 8/10

     

  • Risho

    You all say it was disappointing.
    How was it disappointing? What would you have done differently?

    I was twelve or thirteen when I snuck in with my older friends to see Alien. I
    (nearly) shit my pants that’s how scared I was! Two decades went by before I
    dared to watch it on video but only in the daytime. All this while I kept
    thinking what a great movie. Slowly I got cured of this and braved to watch the
    segues and other movies of type.

    So yes, when the word got out that an Alien related movie is in the making I
    was excited. Went to see it on the opening day – alone. Was I disappointed that
    I sat through it not flinching for a second? I did expect to be more “frightening”,
    however I realized our personal experiences or lack thereof determine our
    emotional relationship with the movie.

    So I think that like all good books, and I presume you people still read books,
    when it leaves you with more questions than answers, then it fulfilled its
    purpose!

    As far as Prometheus concerned, who is to say that perhaps sequels won’t answer
    these unanswered questions? From what I have read elsewhere was neither a
    prequel, or sequel. It was parallel at best, so who’s to say that LV233 wasn’t
    a proving ground of sort where the Engineers experimented with creating life
    forms for whatever purpose?

    As with most authors today, you
    may notice that their writing style resonates throughout all their book, Dan
    Brown, for example. He writes great books but the underlying “framework”
    is the same. Kind of like video games different plot but same game engine
    beneath. That’s why I think there are similarities between the Alien and
    Prometheus – you could have dozens of different writers, but Sir Scott on just
    one.

    I guess will just have to see what the sequels bring. And of course this just my opinion: discuss among
    yourselves.