Steven Moffat Explains The Reasoning Behind ‘Doctor Who’ Scheduling

Posted Tuesday, May 22nd, 2012 08:00 pm GMT -4 by 0

Doctor Who Matt Smith & Karen Gillan

This time last year Whovians were enjoying the exploits of the Doctor as he just met the personification of his beloved TARDIS in ‘The Doctor’s Wife’ and his ganger in ‘The Rebel Flesh.’ This year, however, we’ve have to wait much longer than we’re used to and some fans are wondering what show runner Steven Moffat had in mind with the delay.

In an interview with Digital Spy, Moffat addressed the thought process for the scheduling delay. Although he doesn’t completely admit that the decision was his to make us wait, he does agree with the move:

“I don’t know, on this occasion, that the thinking particularly came from me, actually. I’ve always been open to anything that shakes [the series] up. I think that decision actually came from the BBC.”

“But I’ve been well up for anything that we can do to shake up the transmission pattern, the way we deliver it to the audience and how long we make the audience wait, simply because that makes Doctor Who an event piece.”

Moffat believes that making the fans wait for the start of season 7 would only enhance the viewing experience akin to feeding a starving man:

“The more Doctor Who becomes a perennial, the faster it starts to die. You’ve got to shake it up; you’ve got to keep people on edge and wondering when it will come back. “Sherlock is the prime example, as far as that goes. Sherlock almost exists on starving its audience. By the time it came back this year, Sherlock was like a rock star re-entering the building!

So keeping Doctor Who as an event, and never making people feel, ‘Oh, it’s lovely, reliable old Doctor Who – it’ll be on about this time, at that time of year’. Once you start to do that, just slowly, it becomes like any much-loved ornament in your house – ultimately invisible. And I don’t want that to ever be the case.”

This year, we’ll only get to see 5 new episodes culminating with the Amy and Rory’s departure. Then there will be a break before the Christmas episode is aired introducing Jenna Louise Coleman as the new companion. Then sometime in 2013, the last 8 episodes of the series will then air.

Fans have been long debating about the astuteness of this move and many feel the inconsistency of the show’s scheduling may cause a decrease in viewership.  The shuffling of the show was one of the reasons for the start of the show’s demise in the 1980’s. Without a doubt, however, when ‘Doctor Who’ does return this fall it will be an event not to miss and I wouldn’t be surprised if the show trended on Twitter on that day.

What do you think of Moffat’s reasoning? Would you rather have ‘Doctor Who’ air at the same time each year or do you think anticipation is a good thing for the show?

  • Doug

    “Moffat believes that making the fans wait for the start of season 7
    would only enhance the viewing experience akin to feeding a starving
    man”

    Starve a man too much and he dies.

    • dusk

      Or find some other more readily available food.

    • Flashman

      Trust the Moff and worry not. ;^)

  • Faithful Companion

    I guess the fact that the summer olympics will be airing could have entered the equation.

  • Marksmind

    Starving does not make the food taste better.
    Waiting does not make it better, just makes it later.

  • Janice Kay

    Looks like I’m not the only one who doesn’t like starving!

  • EmC

    It makes sense to keep viewers and loyal fans excited and grasping for every piece of “spoilers” they can possibly find while awaiting for the yet to be announced air date of the new season! I’m actually quite ecstatic that despite the wait, there is always a new sliver of fandom that peaks out onto the inter-web everyday from new and old whovians alike. 

  • Bob G.

    That reasoning is just plain dumb. What is really going on is that fans are getting screwed out of a whole series of Doctor Who. There should have been 14 episodes, (13 plus Christmas) of Doctor Who in 2012, and another 14 in 2013, but for that 2 year period we are only getting what amounts to a single series of 14 episodes – 6 in 2012 and another 8 in 2013.. Are the UK fans, who have to pay license fees, complaining about it? It’s a hell of a way to celebrate the shows 50th anniversary. If anything, this landmark anniversary should have more, not fewer episodes for the fans to enjoy. Well, you asked for comments.