The ‘Matrix’ – Revisited

Posted Tuesday, June 21st, 2011 03:46 pm GMT -4 by 0

The following is a guest post by Alexander Hammond. Alexander is a writer, traveler, cynic and essayist, whose passions are fantasy, Science Fiction and humor writing, astronomy, quality cinema, the environment and wildlife. When not writing, he can generally be found doing his day job of traveling the word at his client’s expense. Often, to their horror, at their very considerable expense.

We reviewed his current book ‘Tales from the Edge of Forever’ earlier in the year and even had the pleasure of an interview. You can connect with Alexander Hammond through Facebook, Twitter or his Blog.


One afternoon back in 1999, I received a phone call from Australia. An excited voice, talking at breakneck speed, urged me to stop what I was doing right now and get myself over to the nearest movie house to check out a film I’d never heard of.

The Matrix

The voice belonged to Julian Parry, a good friend and someone who’s view on cinema I very much respected. This after all was the man who, amongst other things, puppeteered the Alien Queen in Cameron’s masterful ’Aliens’ and had helmed the visual effects in ’Nightbreed’. Oh, and he’d worked on the Bond movies, ’Farscape’ and, well, it’s a long list and I’m sure you get my drift. This guy knew what he was talking about.

Beguilingly, he refused to tell me anything about the movie, save for the fact that I needed to see it ASAP. I did just that.

There are some movies that go beyond entertainment. They have a “specialness” which is almost impossible to quantify without writing a dissertation length eulogy. Originality, superb direction, stunning production design, ground breaking SFX, jaw droppingly good characters and a numbingly creative storyline.

Oh, and of course great martial arts, explosions, guns and very stylish costumes.

I can now still vividly recall thinking as the movie unfolded, “Where is this going? What is the Matrix?, Who are these people? Who is this enigmatic Morpheus?” As the plot developed, I sat in a haze of utter pleasure, totally enthralled by what I was seeing. Yes, I liked it. I LOVED it.

So then, a true “movie moment”. An experience that underlined my love of SF and cinema. A validation if you like, of my obsession with originality and creativity.

And the questions it posed…the concepts it explored…the conversations it stimulated with friends…these all ensured the ’Matrix’ stayed with me for a long time.

I revisited it time and again, eagerly drinking in the minutia of a production that was evidently a labor of love. A labor of love the studio had apparently tried to close down in mid production because they didn’t “get it”. The Wachowski Brothers “got it” and made a masterpiece.

Inevitably, with its enormous success, ’The Matrix Reloaded’ was announced. I was both enthused and wary at the same time.

While running Disney, Michael Eisner once said:

“We have no obligation to make history.
We have no obligation to make art.
We have no obligation to make a statement.
To make money is our only objective.”

OK, so the Matrix wasn’t a Disney movie but his views were mirrored by all studio heads. And you know what? I get it. I understand. It’s a business. But creating a quality follow up product that makes money or just milking an idea, are two very different things.

The initial ’Matrix’ movie was, to me, a perfect stand-alone piece. Nonetheless I was prepared to give the Wachowskis the benefit of the doubt. Surely they wouldn’t sully the original? Whilst I’m sure their decision making would have been influenced by the sound of money trucks backing up outside their houses, from what little I knew of them, they had integrity.

What really concerned me was that two sequels were announced to be filmed back to back. That’s an awful lot of time to fill.

So then, the day came and I settled down to watch ’Reloaded’.

A well produced work with some excellent set pieces and some intriguing concepts thrown into the mix. No, it wasn’t as gripping as the first movie but it wasn’t a total disaster. But, unlike its predecessor, this work was…unsatisfying.

I loved the intellectual sneering of the Merovingian, the concept of the Keymaker, the conversations with the Oracle and the brain stretching narrative of the Architect. Yup, the action was good (though strangely antiseptic) and the costumes rocked yet…

The enigmatic Morpheus was diluted, the sense of mystery from the first movie was gone, the fear of the power of the Agents was missing and don’t get me started on that facile scene in which Neo fights a million Smiths.

Also, suddenly, Zion became important.

Zion, a place I cared about not one bit. These were Matrix movies not Zion movies. Zion, a place populated by badly dressed humorless totalitarians whom I wouldn’t have raised a finger to save. I wanted to see stuff happening in the Matrix, not Zion. I liked the intellectual and philosophical conundrums of what went on in the Matrix, not the grinding boredom of subterranean dwelling flawed humans. Characters who seemed to spend most of their time sniping at each other and not washing.

A short while later, the unmitigated disaster of ’Matrix Revolutions’ came to pass, a movie that all but destroyed the legacy of the two previous endeavors.

Gone was the magic of the first movie and some of the intriguing concepts explored in the second. ’Revolutions’ was simply a special effects extravaganza, with Morpheus relegated to almost a bit part, and any attempt at genuinely resolving the philosophical issues sidestepped for the sake of grindingly dull battles.

It was clear, that beyond the unsatisfactory (and uninteresting) story arc about Zion, the Wachowski’s had no idea where to go after the first movie. Money obviously talks very loud indeed when it’s offered in such large quantities, and when it was talking they were obviously listening. The Studio, with an unexpected hit on their hands, wanted to squeeze as much as they could out of it, as quickly as possible…and it showed.

If I was a shareholder in the Studio I’d applaud the decision, but I’m not, and I won’t.

‘Revolutions’ left a bad taste in my mouth. I confess to being unusually small minded when the Wachowski’s next movie ’Speed Racer’ dramatically tanked. I took pleasure in the critical and financial mauling it took.

It’s been twelve years since I first saw the ‘Matrix’. I watched it again last night.

In a darkened room I once again heard Morpheus say…

“Have you ever had a dream Neo?”

It still gives me a shiver…

Pure magic.

Related articles:

  1. Is ‘Sucker Punch’ The New ‘Matrix’?
  • Leonowski

    While I generally agree with the notion that the 2nd and 3rd movies were not as good as the first, I don’t think they are as bad as you say.  A huge chunk of the story is actually played out in the video game (Ghost and Niobe) and in the Animatrix (the Osiris story is awesome!) .  Submersing yourself in the entire Matrix experience helps round out everything and makes you hate it a bit less!  :)

    • Alexander Hammond

      Thanks for taking the time to post Leonowski. I particularly enjoyed your final comment of “Makes you hate it a but less.”

  • Beibers

    i personally think you hit the nail on the head about this collection (won’t call it a trilogy). first film was amazing and changed the way movies are made. but i thought watching the next 2 was a total waste of time. it’s like they had bits and pieces of a story after the first film and just didn’t know how to put them together which clearly showed. Michael Eisner’s “only objective” is a common mentality with many studio heads which is a major reason why we have so many horrible films. i guess that’s why Netflix is so huge these days. i love the experience of watching the big screen but rising ticket prices for beyond silly movies is very disappointing.

    • Alexander Hammond

      “it’s like they had bits and pieces of a story after the first film and
      just didn’t know how to put them together which clearly showed”   I concur absolutely Beibers.

  • Nigel Seel

    I distinctly remember standing as the credits rolled at the end of the second Matrix film, angry and resentful at how I’d been cheated. I refused to watch the third.

    It’s been so many years and still The Matrix towers over subsequent SF movies. Great movies do make money and it’s not as if there aren’t concepts out there capable of utterly subverting your worldview. Perhaps the truth is that making truly great films is extremely difficult.

    • Alexander Hammond

      Your comment “making truly great films is extremely difficult”……never a truer word spoken…and yet when the effort is made it generally shows. Too bad that effort is rarely made in its real sense. I’d rather see an ambitious failure than watch production line garbage.

  • Anonymous

    I firmly believe if the 2nd and 3rd Matrix movies never saw the light of day we would all still be talking about the greatness of the Matrix and pining for another installment.

    • Alexander Hammond

      I totally concur with your view…

  • http://twitter.com/cmdonatello Christine Donatello

    This is a great article.  I couldn’t agree more.  Honestly, I almost feel bad for everyone involved in the production of 2 and 3 because of course they wanted it to be successful.  But when you make something as awe inspiring as the first one, sometimes it’s best to just let that one be your “notch on your belt” and move on.  I would’ve rather been sitting here talking about the greatness of the first Matrix then how disappointing the other ones were, but here we are.  It just goes to show that money can motivate people to do some very unwise things.

    • Alexander Hammond

      Thanks for your view Christine. I wouldn’t argue with anything you’ve said. I prefer just to think of the first one when I think of this ‘trilogy’.

  • Dave Taylor

    Nicely written, and I agree with your assessment of the delight of the first film and the all-too-inevitable decay of subsequent films in the series. As you said, the intellectual facets of the solipsistic universe of The Matrix are fascinating to watch but once they posit this world, it’s very hard to know where to go subsequently and to go from “break out of fake, see the reality around you” to the humdrum “fight the aliens with their superior tech” is just such a boring sci-fi trope. Heck, it’s what made me turn off Falling Skies after an hour…

    Here’s the interesting question, though: if the studio offered to hire you to reboot the series, could you do it? What new storyline would you come up with?

    • Alexander Hammond

      Hi Dave…what a fascinating question “What would I do with a re boot?”

      Without wobbling on at too greater length, I think that if one deconstructs the Architects wonderful narrative, there are elements within it that could be explored and explored within the environment of the actual Matrix…which is the environment we like to see. He mentions for example the almost symbiotic relationship between him and the Oracle. That would be just one of a number of facets that would be interesting to investigate.

      Just an idea…

  • Jan Arzooman

    Good piece about bad sequels ruining a good thing. They should have stuck with one “Rocky,” too. Of course Keanu Reeves is brilliant in everything he does, so I could understand people were clamoring for his return.